Jul
18
Posted (User ImageBrandon Satrom) in Architecture, Content Mangement, EA, ECM, Enterprise Architecture, SOA, User Experience on July-18-2007

Saw a post this morning (via James McGovern) entitled ”Hello World! Untie the Gardener” by a blogger named ingine. It’s a brief and basic call to action for more people to step out and get more ideas and dialogue around EA going. I concur with this call and am seconding it (or thirding or thirtying it). My primary motive for this blog is to get the ideas that float around our teams and our organization out into the world and grind them out. The result will nearly always be a better set than when I started. Most recently for me, the topics and discussion around Declarative EA and Buy vs. Build have only refined and improved my ideas. So hear hear! Let’s get more of this going.

 

When James provided his link to this post, he asked ingine to “…start the conversation by asking specific questions.” I’m sure ingine has questions or topics of his own, but I’d be happy to throw out some my random ideas and questions and see if we can grease the skids a bit:

 

1) What are some proven methods around iterative EA? We’ve all heard the chant of “Future State-Current State-Gap Analysis-Migration Plan” enough to have it embedded in our souls, but how do we leverage these good ideas in a way that doesn’t relegate EA to functioning as a team of Binder Boys?

2) Folks like Simon Guest with Microsoft (and many others), have started to collaborate with the User Experience community (The likes of Lou Rosenfeld, Peter Moreville, Jesse James Garret) for more interplay between Architecture and UX. Is this part of a bigger trend of moving away from EA as process and into EA “for the people?” I, for one, would love to see that happen, but what does that mean for the process- and framework-heavy aspects of traditional EA (I’m looking at you mister Zachman)?

3) How does well-run EA best serve an organization first instead of worrying about controlling its decisions? On that note, how does well-run EA best serve its stakeholders first?

4) Is Microsoft on to something with this OBA thing? For that matter, are we really there with Composite Applications? Personally, I see this very idea as an evolution of Enterprise Architectures which serve the user by creating naturally productive applications, but what do others think?

5) How can an organization already in bed with a major software vendor more towards welcoming open source where it makes sense? What experiences have others had in this realm?

6) Is ECM mature enough to be of strategic value to most organizations, or does the visible lack of standards and market volatility mean that we aren’t there yet?

7) Is it okay to have a list of random EA questions and not ask any about SOA?… crap. 

 

I’ll stop there for now, though more are bouncing around. Some of these are already in my blogging queue, but I’d love to hear from others on any and all of these. Let’s get some dialogue going…

Rate this:
2.5


Comments:
no imageSrinidhi Boray (Check me out!) on July 18th, 2007 at 3:39 pm #

Hi Brandon,

Yes I will get some questions about EA out in the open. I am keeping my ears pressed to the things happenning in the DC market, which is considered the EA capital. Also, have been on the commercial market. Will try to get thoughts out of the FEAC Institute, as I am affliated with it.

Regarding, EA being declarative. There had been attempts in the Federal to design executable EA. To my mind it has failed, or has not shown any results so far. EA is a pluralistic framework, and at this time it is more of a planning device and is ‘descriptive’ in nature not declarative. It is worth taking note that Framework themselves are not architecture and they are mere representations, via a set of reference architectures.

thx…
srinidhi

no imageBrandon Satrom (Check me out!) on July 19th, 2007 at 7:10 am #

Hi Srinidhi,

Thanks for dropping by and for bringing DC and FEAC perspectives to bear in EA conversations.

I’d be interested in hearing more detail on your assertion that EA is pluralistic and that EA is a descriptive planning device. Is this something you could blog about at more length?

Also, I don’t disagree that frameworks are representations and not architecture itself. However, they are also guidance and sometimes that guidance is too hefty and burdensome to teams just trying to “get EA done.” We don’t all have the luxury of the Federal Government in that space. :)

no imageSrinidhi Boray (Check me out!) on July 19th, 2007 at 11:24 am #

Have posted abstracts from EA Zone (www.feacinstitute.org), in my blog. EA Zone has a lot of organized participation from experienced EA professionals. It is certainly worth a peek into their projects and EA thoughts. Hope this is helpful.

no imageJoe Lewis (Check me out!) on July 19th, 2007 at 7:06 pm #

Good call - I’ll try to put some of my rants together and post them.

no imageBrandon Satrom (Check me out!) on July 19th, 2007 at 7:28 pm #

@Srinidhi, thanks for posting those abstracts. I look forward to digging through those soon.

@Joe, I look forward to hearing your thoughts and ideas.

[...] James McGovern has lamented in the past, and Brandon Satrom recently, there really aren’t a lot of enterprise architects working in typical corporate IT blogging. [...]

no imageMike Walker (Check me out!) on July 28th, 2007 at 11:50 am #

Great questions on the space, I have commented on them on my blog.

http://blogs.msdn.com/mikewalker/archive/2007/07/23/calling-in-the-ea-troops.aspx

no imageBrandon Satrom (Check me out!) on July 30th, 2007 at 12:56 pm #

Hey Mike,

thanks for the direct responses! I appreciate your input and perspective!

no imageMaximus (Check me out!) on December 19th, 2007 at 11:37 pm #

I would like to see a continuation of the topic

no imageBrandon Satrom (Check me out!) on December 20th, 2007 at 3:43 pm #

Hey Maximus,

What exactly are you looking for? Any particular topics?

Post a comment
Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: