Archive for the ‘Content Mangement’ Category

 
Oct
03
Posted (Brandon Satrom) in Architecture, Content Mangement, ECM, Search on October-3-2007

 

  • Office Live Workspace revealed: a free 250MB “SharePoint Lite” for everyone - This isn’t the Google killer since it’s not an “online” version of the classic office applications. What it is is the slow-moving-and-customer-ignorant-IT-organization killer, which is a great thing as far as I’m concerned.
  • Sharepoint is not a good development platform / SharePoint is a good development platform for applications / SharePoint is an Awesome Dev App Platform - One of our SA’s said early on in his experience with MOSS 2007 application development that “MOSS takes the rapid out of Rapid Application Development,” which I think is true in the OOB development experience. Since then, however, we have been able to experiment with varying ways to develop apps in MOSS and have started to see areas where we can create value and assist in speed by abstracting out some of the complexity. That being said, Visual Studio needs to catch up and help make that development experience richer. As Andrew Connell said, that’s a knock on tooling and the development environment, not the platform itself.

  • MOSS Faceted Search (CodePlex) - If you’re using or plan to use MOSS and you want your users to get the most value out of Search, I would recommend taking a serious look at faceted search.

 

All MOSS Links today… some days are just like that I suppose. :)

 



 
Jul
18
Posted (Brandon Satrom) in Architecture, Content Mangement, EA, ECM, Enterprise Architecture, SOA, User Experience on July-18-2007

Saw a post this morning (via James McGovern) entitled ”Hello World! Untie the Gardener” by a blogger named ingine. It’s a brief and basic call to action for more people to step out and get more ideas and dialogue around EA going. I concur with this call and am seconding it (or thirding or thirtying it). My primary motive for this blog is to get the ideas that float around our teams and our organization out into the world and grind them out. The result will nearly always be a better set than when I started. Most recently for me, the topics and discussion around Declarative EA and Buy vs. Build have only refined and improved my ideas. So hear hear! Let’s get more of this going.

 

When James provided his link to this post, he asked ingine to “…start the conversation by asking specific questions.” I’m sure ingine has questions or topics of his own, but I’d be happy to throw out some my random ideas and questions and see if we can grease the skids a bit:

 

1) What are some proven methods around iterative EA? We’ve all heard the chant of “Future State-Current State-Gap Analysis-Migration Plan” enough to have it embedded in our souls, but how do we leverage these good ideas in a way that doesn’t relegate EA to functioning as a team of Binder Boys?

2) Folks like Simon Guest with Microsoft (and many others), have started to collaborate with the User Experience community (The likes of Lou Rosenfeld, Peter Moreville, Jesse James Garret) for more interplay between Architecture and UX. Is this part of a bigger trend of moving away from EA as process and into EA “for the people?” I, for one, would love to see that happen, but what does that mean for the process- and framework-heavy aspects of traditional EA (I’m looking at you mister Zachman)?

3) How does well-run EA best serve an organization first instead of worrying about controlling its decisions? On that note, how does well-run EA best serve its stakeholders first?

4) Is Microsoft on to something with this OBA thing? For that matter, are we really there with Composite Applications? Personally, I see this very idea as an evolution of Enterprise Architectures which serve the user by creating naturally productive applications, but what do others think?

5) How can an organization already in bed with a major software vendor more towards welcoming open source where it makes sense? What experiences have others had in this realm?

6) Is ECM mature enough to be of strategic value to most organizations, or does the visible lack of standards and market volatility mean that we aren’t there yet?

7) Is it okay to have a list of random EA questions and not ask any about SOA?… crap. 

 

I’ll stop there for now, though more are bouncing around. Some of these are already in my blogging queue, but I’d love to hear from others on any and all of these. Let’s get some dialogue going…



 
Aug
24
Posted (Brandon Satrom) in Content Mangement on August-24-2005

Here’s an interesting image from Channel 9 at MSDN. On the second page, you’ll see a talk by Anders Hejlsberg entitled “Programming data in C# 3.0.” The image has since changed, but here is the original:

conotentass.jpg

I think it speaks volumes about how lack of content workflow means laughs for the rest of the world. Especially when the Evil Empire is involved.

Channel9, CM, workflow